AmazonBasics products are quality electronics accessories offered at a great value.The AmazonBasics Universal Soft Camera Case for Slim Digital Cameras features a firm polyester exterior and a soft interior to keep your digital camera protected from bumps and scrapes. Its light, compact design includes a built-in belt loop and a small zippered exterior pocket that can store batteries or memory cards.
Universal Camera Case
for Digital Cameras HF
At a Glance Firm polyester exteri... check this out...
- Durable camera carrying case for slim digital cameras
- Case interior is soft and plush to protect from scratches; firm and protective exterior for added protection
- Internal dimensions: 3.15 x 1.57 x 4.73 inches (80mm x 40mm x 120mm)
- Distributed by Amazon.com; backed by one-year Amazon Basics warranty
- Ships in Certified Frustration-Free Packaging
Check Out AmazonBasics Universal Camera Case for Digital Cameras HF (Black) Reviews.
Questions...
what digital camera is good for printing the photos 8x10 on my computer?
how many mexipixils will i need to do this in high quality.i looked on ebay for a digital camera since i dont have one and there are thousands to choose from.i need it to take the pictuers and transfer it and print.i want to do 8x10 as the largest,but want good quality.i read that a minimum of 7.0 mexipixel is reuired for 8x10.is that the root i should go?
Answers...
Answer by GordonH
Yes, get at least a 7 megapixel camera. It will provide a very good quality picture for 8x10 prints. From cost perspective, it's worth the extra few dollars than settling for a 6 or 5 megapixel camera. Canon and Sony make some excellent 7 MP cameras.
I got mine from eBay, just be careful you get a seller than has 99% or better feedback rating and at least a few hundred transactions.
Hope this helps!
Tags: Sony a Digital Camera, high quality
{ 16 Comments… read them below or add one }
This is a very big P&S camera case. It will probably fit the biggest P&S cameras. The dimensions in the description are the internal dimensions. The external seams and heavy padding give the case some huge external dimensions: 6″x4″x2.5″. This thing won’t fit in your pocket.
The top flap and the belt loop are secured by pieces of generic velcro. They seem fairly secure when new, but will they get too weak with use? Definitely keep an eye on those if you don’t want your camera to go flying.
The materials are very nice and the design is good. I want to report the internal measurements of mine, which seem at variance with others: 5 x 3 x 1.5″. It is a perfect fit for my Kodak Z915. The outside pocket is 4.5 x 3.3″ with a nice zipper near the top and an expansion flap on the left side. (My Duracell PPS2 Li instant charger which is a small external USB battery, fits nicely in there with its cable, although it is not an accessory that I would use with that particular camera.)
The function and padding of this bag are excellent and a very good buy at this price point. The only downside is poor worksmanship in sewing: on mine neither the belt loop nor the flap velcro strip are centered. Neither flaw is going to make any difference in the use of the bag.
Not much to say about a case. Main thing is that it protects my camera nicely, and I also use it for my HTC EVO. It fits on your belt nicely and I feel it provides an adequate amount of protection for either a phone, mp3 player, or point and shoot camera.
It’s about all you could ask for in an inexpensive case. It’s not elegant, but it’s able to hold my fairly large compact camera plus a spare battery. It’s also well padded enough so I don’t worry about the occasional bump.
This case is on the big side for my Kodak digital cameras, but it fits my Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1 TB USB 2.0 Ultra-Portable External Hard Drive STAA1000100 (Black)like a glove. The USB cable fits in the outer zipper pocket, which has a side gusset so you can store chubby items like AA batteries or a battery pack. As for the padding, I wouldn’t hand it to a gorilla like on the old suitcase commercials, but it’s sufficient to protect the HD from purse/backpack jostling. Great, cheaper alternative to made-for-HD cases.
I agree that a 7 megapixel is the correct range. However, If you are looking for quality prints i wholeheartedly recommend not printing them at home. There are more than enough places to print and mail to your home. Personally I use kodakgallery.com and in a pinch when i need them faster I use Walmart.com because you can send the pictures and pick them up same day. Believe compared to what you pay in ink cartridges and paper you will not only save money but the prints will be much higher quality.
Honestly my friend, even with a 12.o megapixel camera, if you’re printing it on a $29 printer, your photos will turn ou tlike CRAPOLA!
If you’re insisting for some reason to print at home, you’ll need a pretty high quality printer, as well as nice semi/glossy paper, and special photo cartridges.
As mentioned above, MUCH more practical to print them at Wal-Mart… unless you’re trying to take pics and print stuff you don’t want the people at wallyworld to see.
Good luck!
What you have heard seems to be correct for high quality prints (assuming you have a high quality photo printer).
Here’s a good chart showing the relationship between printed size, quality and pixel counts. The chart won’t copy here, so click on the link.
HIgh quality photo printing is done at 300 dots per inch. this means you need a shot that is 2400 dots high and 3000 dots high, multiply this together and you find that you need 7.2 MP. However acceptable printing can be done down to 75 DPI. Doing the maths on this you find you only need 0.45 MP. Anywhere in between will be fine. So you see you do not need to worry too much about MP for an 8 x 10 shot.
As for quality the Canon Pixma Series printers print as fine as 1 picolitre, which is finer than a lot of photo labs use. The Canons also come with Chroma Life 100 ink which is supposed to last for 100 years. I just don’t know how you collect on a warranty like that.
buy from a shop –ask why is it on e-bay -why is the person selling it probably because it is not suitable or isn`t 100%reliable.”buyer beware” if you go to a good photo outlet they will usually let you take a photo and for a small fee enlarge it to 8×10 for you.then you will know it`s the camera you want.hope this helps.
All interesting answers and the chart that David R linked to is useful. It does look like 7mP is correct. However, when I first got into digital photography, 3mP was the highest pixel count you could find and I recall the salesman at Wolf showing me some 8×10 photos he said he made with the Nikon 990. Maybe he was lying but they sure looked good to me and showed no pixelation.
a 5 mp will do the job
a 6 or 7 would also be fine
My daughter and I take our cd’s to store to get our 8X10 prints. My camera is 6 megapixels, hers is 5 MP and both come out excellent. So much for minimum of 7 megapixels.
If your camera is 8 mp and up, yes, you can.
csOhh, this is bad but interesting black on black eyed peas shut black gay black ebony black gay black women in black girls black the black
Hi, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any assistance is very much appreciated.
You must log in to post a comment.